I worry sometimes that I’m becoming too cynical about the
world. I don’t know if it’s a matter of upbringing or just the nature of being
a millennial, but I’ve always kind of relished in the thought of “damning the
man.” I’m not talking about raging against every indiscriminate male I meet or
sleeping in Zuccotti Park as a middle finger to the 1 percent. I have a hard
time trusting people when I can’t distinguish their motives. I assume they have
motives. And it’s exhausting. Sometimes I see the scowl lines on my forehead
from scrunching my brow over something I don’t quite believe, and I wonder if
it would be easier to just let things go. Maybe I’d sleep more. Maybe I’d smile
more. However, I do believe it’s necessary to be skeptical, rather than
cynical.
Skepticism,
to me, is a matter of who you are and why you’re doing it. It’s about that
nagging tug you feel in your chest that’s just begging you to ask the question
and the challenge to decipher the answer you’re given. It’s wonderful and terrifying.
Over the
summer I spent in D.C., working for a wire service, I thought it would be
appropriate to read the autobiography of longtime White House correspondent
Helen Thomas. What I found was a woman who spent her whole life as a skeptic,
but an endearing, sensitive skeptic. Thomas said the key her success as a
journalist was that there was no topic that did not garner a question. There
was no topic that shouldn’t be questioned.
I admit I
find it irritating when people stop asking questions. The face-value acceptance
of information is the Achilles heel of our society. We’d rather accept what we
agree with than question our own beliefs. I get it’s difficult. It’s
uncomfortable. It’s sometimes confrontational. But I believe in being a skeptic
because it’s always worth asking why.
No comments:
Post a Comment